FUTURECRAFT 02: Material notes

This evening the incredibly salient crux of the frustration that drove this years’ topic was addressed indirectly.  We had three excellent workshops represented in tonights’ panelists with Peter David Studio, Gulassa Studio, and the UW Lamborghini Carbon Fiber lab.  Peter gave a fantastic overview of his self-taught track through becoming one of the most fantastic architectural glass masters in the region displaying beautifully extravagant visions executed in hundreds of devised and deviant glass textures, colors, and mixes.

Jules and Chris from Gulassa and Co. displayed a fantastic foray into multiple mediums of fabrication, customization, design, and their incredible workshop setting – these two were people that had devised their own roles in crafting materials.  All of the panelists either had a self-taught or academic background, bringing up a rather interesting disconnection with the whole idea of a crafstman- perhaps that argument is archaic and we can move on to new frustrations in this dialog.

Finishing, Paolo Feraboli displayed a polished track through his research and Lamborghini’s application of carbon fiber – a relatively young composite of carbon threads and a form of joining polymer or glue.  This material is capable of incredible strength, production times, and most importantly ultra light weight.  The application has been to strategically devise  pieces of the famed automobile in order to cut carbon emissions, and more importantly make the vehicle as light as possible.  This work culminated in what you see below – an incredibly crafted and materially progressive luxury vehicle the sixth element – a new Lamborghini composed of primarily carbon fiber shell structure and detailing.  This was unveiled at last years’ Paris Auto Show.

The discussion following was amazing.  Paolo did  not see a future for carbon fiber parallel to the future taken by plywood, and carbon steel, materials we saw born for industrial purposes but now being freely manipulated for aesthetic and expressive aims.  He made a crucial point in saying using the material to do what other materials had done before was an entire mistake on the makers’ behalf and went on to explain the disconnect between the inefficiencies of the material and what happens when it is used as a steel structural element in construction and design.  The material was created to do its’ job he stated.  This type of thinking was met by comments from Rob Corser, the moderator, as well as the other artisans as perhaps limited.  We all hoped that, like most other industrial materials we have progressed, hybridized composited, and designed with, carbon fiber will see its’ own monetary value go down and allow it to enter the more common markets and not just the aerospace and high-end automotive industry.

The divorce from these types of industry and our local architecture and craft create an interesting paradigm.  Could our regions’ powerful ingenuity that is so localized in the Seattle area re-inject our architecture and cities with a more experimental form of developing and thriving within our landscape.  Can carbon fiber sciences and its’ extreme resistance to corrosion, light weight, and fast production time lend it to become a building element, or a crucial detail for enclosure?

- Daniel Toole, Assoc. AIA

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


Join us for our continuing discussion on Craft with a look at Material. Our next salon will be held on Wednesday, June 29th at 5:30pm. The salon will take place at the Henry Built in downtown Seattle, and will be moderated by Rob Corser. The presenters for this salon will include:

Paolo Feraboli of UW’s Advanced Composite Structures Laboratory http://www.aa.washington.edu/faculty/feraboli/http://me.ucsb.edu/events/me-seminar-what-do-lamborghini-and-boeing-787-have-common

Jules Hughes, Chris Flechtner and Bill Jedreszejewski of Gulassa & Co. http://www.gulassaco.com/index.html

Peter David of Peter David Studio Inc. http://www.peterdavidstudio.com/

Hope you can join us!

Posted in Design Salon | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

WHICHCRAFT notes

Today I attended the AIA Seattle’s WHICHCRAFT conference.  This conference sought out a critical discussion on craft through a number of panel discussions and presentations.  Throughout the day architects, traditional craftsmen, rapid protoypers, software testers, and a number of others focused on the relationship of craftsmanship to the region, design, our current technology, economy, and essentially our architecture.

The day was opened with a great talk by the provocative Larry Rouch, who highlighted the non-architectural craft history in the region with a presentation ranging from the poignant display of wealth through the burning of precious crafted items (such as the pictured woven cedar bark blankets) by the Native people prior to the settling of the Seattle area.  He then went on to describe great things accomplished in the aerospace, nautical, and industrial engineering world that set quite an act to follow for the continuing discussion on architecture and construction throughout the day.

Some of the key highlights included discussions of how architectural practices and design practices are integrating newer tools in digital fabrication and analysis that affect both the design process, and more salient perhaps, the practice of architecture.  Some of the modular craft discussion offered the ever interesting (and slightly scary) reality of consumer-based craft, or the mass-produced.  This juxtaposition of the early morning with an emphasis on new tools and developments in the construction industry coupled with the sensuous and often profligate display of opulence in local wood, steel, and glass crafting created some very intriguing thoughts.

Is the fetishization of the craftsman in our architecture able to be consumed by all in the region or have we let it become too much of a private thing comparable (as a good friend said) to “bling”.  Think about that!

Additionally, with the discussion of the great northwest modernism documentary Modern Views by the UW and studio 216, a return to the roots of our regionalism, and often “craft” became very apparent.  The fantastic northwest style, or essentially international style with exposed timber frames and siding has laid a course that we still follow today and many of us still empathize with.  Things like John Yeon’s Watzek house in Portland put the northwest on the map with a showing at MoMA in the 30′s and I believe much of what we are noticed for on a larger than local level is still falling in that line with the addition of perhaps steel to the palette.  What is the future of the Northwest Style? Of craft?

I think this topic will always be prevalent in the next decades of architectural growth in the region.  There is a frustration that the residential stock of architecture can maintain a nice connection to the crafted, low-tech, exposed, vernacular-inspired architecture of the past, yet as we continue to develop, many building types possess an expression not diferent form other parts of the country.  It seems the discussion shifts between regionalism, craft, and sustainability constantly searching for a fresh expression of our place in this world.

How can we start to integrate these fantastic local harbingers like Boeing, Microsoft, Amazon, and Nike into our built environment?  These companies all work in brand new materials or composites – can the northwest style learn from the northwest style of other creative industries?

FUTURECRAFT will continue to address this fantastic discussion that was greatly contributed to today by the events of Whichcraft.  Please join us next Wednesday, June 29th for the continuation of the dialogue at henrybuilt in Pioneer Square at 5 30.

- Daniel Toole, Assoc. AIA

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Book Salon #2 Recap

On Wednesday, June 1st, the Seattle Design Committee met at Bathtub Gin Co. to discuss Juhani Pallasmaa’s book, The Thinking Hand for their second Book Salon. Like the previous book salon, the book was chosen in respect to the committee’s yearly theme: FutureCraft.

Some major points focused on were again the role of drawing and sketching and its relation to the hand and design.  Pallasmaa’s pointed out that tools, such as the pencil were extensions of the hand and body. Can this idea be translated to today’s technology with a computer. When one is using one’s hand to draft or sketch, one is constantly scanning the drawing. This scanning process helps the information sink in. Can a computer mouse produce the same affect?

The Trial and Error of Sketching

We discussed why there has been such a large focus in local architectural discourse, as well as internationally.  Has the division of the architect from the master builder marginalized us into a generalist occupation, who is master of nothing? Pallasmaa and Sennett both stated that one should incorporate 10,00 hours into one’s practice in order to become an expert. Does the modern architectural office reflect this or nurture this process? How can an emerging professional become more involved with every aspect of the design process and refine his or her skills? Are architects really craftsman? How can one distinguish between Artist, Designer, and Craftsman?

Some great points to transition us into our next chapter of FutureCraft, in which we explore material. Check back with our blog to see upcoming events for later in the month.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Culture of Craft Conference

The AIA Committee on Design presents a 4 day conference on The Culture of Craft: Modern Views of the Pacific Northwest. The event begins with a reception on Thursday, June 23, 2011 and continues with informative presentations through Sunday, June 26, 2011. They will be held in a variety of areas in the downtown Seattle region.

This conference will illustrate how designers today can learn from both sustainable and economic choices made over 50 years ago by a small, yet influential group of architects heavily influenced by the notion of “less is more” in a period that shared some of the same economic challenges we face today. The work of Arne Bystrom, Wendell Lovett, Gene Zema, Ralph Anderson and Fred Basetti will be connected to that of the generations that have followed including the local yet nationally recognized Miller|Hull, Cutler Anderson, Suyama Peterson Deguchi and Olson Kundig Architects, continuing on to young firms exploring these same issues in new ways; Graham Baba, Workshop AD, SHED and more.

To register, please check out http://tinyurl.com/3rxbff7 .  There will also be a $50 dollar discount given for those who register for the WhichCRAFT: Dialogues (http://www.aiaseattle.org/whichcraft )

Sounds like a great event!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

FUTURECRAFT Book 02 – The Thinking Hand

Join us June 1st, 2011 from 5:30 to 7:30 for the second in our FUTURECRAFT book discussions.

If you enjoy a cozy hang out with a vintage edge and a wide selection of cocktails, then you’ll be thrilled to join the Seattle Design Committee at the Bathtub Gin in Belltown for our next book salon discussion. The Bathtub Gin is located at 2205 2nd Avenue, in downtown Seattle. Remember, we are reading The Thinking Hand by Juhani Pallasmaa. Be sure to pick up your copy and join us for a night of discussion, drinks and good times.


View Larger Map
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Futurecraft “The Hand” Salon Series – review

Last Wednesday, March 30th, The Seattle Design Committe held their first salon event which introduced this year’s theme FUTURECRAFT. This salon’s focus was centered on the subject of the hand within the greater concept of craft.

The event featured three different presenters and was moderated by Rob Corser of the UW’s architecture and digital fabrication programs. The salon was located at the Henrybuilt showroom, which provided a beautiful backdrop for the night’s discussion.

Each presenter reviewed their own feelings on “handcrafted” items, and what it means to the Seattle area. Shaun Peterson shared examples of his art and his crafting techniques. Much of his art is native to the area and to his people, but many of the traditional techniques have evolved into a more modern approach. Leonard Garfield reviewed the role of craft throughout Seattle’s young history in humanizing, civilizing, and beautifying, raising the point that much of Seattle was built as a type of “comfortable” city that was meant for the working class. He went on to describe how Seattle is excellent at the global and at the domestic, but has not really strived at being a major populous city.  This means the level of attention perhaps, to the public realm has not really been in the forefront for Seattle’s industrial history of great invention and technical accomplishment. Finally, Rick Sundberg showcased his appreciation for the minor details of craft, even fondly referring to the nuts and bolts of a project, specifically citing a number of recent residences, furniture pieces, and the Wing Luke Asian Art Museum as examples.

As the night came to a close, Rob opened the idea of craft to the audience. A hearty discussion continued on the definition of craft, and how it fits into the modern world. Needless to say, a definitive conclusion was not reached, but it seems our theme for the year has inspired many designers to wrestle with the idea of what craft is, what it means, and how we can progress it.

We would like to thank our presenters: Shaun Peterson, Leonard Garfield, and Rick Sundberg. Also, a big thank you to the Henrybuilt showroom, and to everyone who came to our first salon of 2011. Please feel free to browse more photos from the night here. Great start to the discussion! Let’s keep it going!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment